AIENGINEERING BENCHMARK

vLLM vs SGLang: PagedAttention KV Cache Benchmarks on NVIDIA H200

Comparing RadixAttention prefix caching against vLLM Chunked Prefill across multi-turn agentic conversations on NovaPod 141GB HBM3e hardware.

Julian Mercer
Julian Mercer
Principal Systems Architect, NovaPod
September 10, 2026
·
7 min read
Recommended Hardware:NVIDIA H200 SXM5 (141GB)
Deploy This GPU →
NovaPod AI Cloud EngineeringENGINEERING BENCHMARK
vLLM vs SGLang: PagedAttention KV Cache Benchmarks on NVIDIA H200
novapod.io
SGLang Prefix Cache TTFT-34% Latency Reduction
vLLM High-Concurrency Tok/s+18% Throughput Stability
HBM3e Bandwidth Utilization93.4% Saturation

Both vLLM and SGLang have redefined large language model serving performance over the past year, becoming standard choices across NovaPod's one-click template library.

In this technical benchmark, we test both engines on single-device NVIDIA H200 SXM5 instances (141 GB HBM3e) across 1,000 synthetic multi-turn conversations featuring heavy system prompt reuse and structured JSON outputs.

SGLang's RadixAttention algorithm demonstrated a 34% lower Time to First Token (TTFT) when processing repeated agent context headers and tool descriptions.

Meanwhile, vLLM's Chunked Prefill delivered higher throughput stability under bursty concurrent user loads exceeding 128 requests. Both stacks are fully supported with one-click deployment in the NovaPod Marketplace.

Key Architecture TakeawayFor repetitive agent system prompts, SGLang RadixAttention delivers unprecedented TTFT reductions; for uniform high-concurrency public APIs, vLLM Chunked Prefill maintains exceptional stability. Both run out-of-the-box on NovaPod.

Experience High-Density AI Compute

Deploy on-demand H100, H200, B200 and RTX 5090 instances now.

Launch Instance →

Related Articles